Qualcomm Adreno 660 vs Qualcomm Adreno 630 vs Qualcomm Adreno 618
Qualcomm Adreno 660 ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 660 ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 868 ARM-SoC integrierte Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets. Der Chip ist ab Anfang 2021 erhältlich und wird hauptsächlich in Android-basierten High-End Geräten eingesetzt.
Laut Qualcomm bietet die Adreno 660 GPU eine um 35% höhere Performance als die alte Adreno 650 im Snapdragon 865. Außerdem konnte die Energieeffizienz um 20% erhöht werden (auch dank des neuen 5nm Prozess).
Neben der Performance gab es auch noch Qualitätsverbesserungen bei der Darstellung (siehe Bild).
Qualcomm Adreno 630 ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 630 ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 ARM-SoC integrierte Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets. Der Chip ist ab Anfang 2018 erhältlich und wird hauptsächlich in Android-basierten High-End Geräten eingesetzt.
Laut Qualcomm bietet die Adreno 630 GPU eine um 30% höhere Performance als die alte Adreno 530 im Snapdrago 835 bei 30% weniger Stromverbrauch.
Qualcomm Adreno 618 ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 618 ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 und 730G verbaute Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets (hautsächlich Android basiert). Sie ist in der oberen Mittelklasse positioniert.
Die Performance der Adreno 618 sollte leicht oberhalb der Adreno 616 liegen. In unseren Benchmarks sehen wir eine 14 - 30% höhere Performance. Falls die GPU im 730G verbaut wird, ist zusätzlich mit einer 15% höheren Leistung zu rechnen (durch höhere Taktraten).
Die Adreno 600 Serie unterstützt laut Wikipedia Vulkan 1.0, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 Full und DirectX 11_1. Der Chip sollte daher ein abgespeckter Adreno 630 (weniger Shader?) sein.
Qualcomm Adreno 660 Qualcomm Adreno 630 Qualcomm Adreno 618 Adreno 600 Serie Shared Memory ja ja ja API DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2 DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2 DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan Herstellungsprozess 7 nm 10 nm 14 nm Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1 OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) Erscheinungsdatum 02.12.2020 12.02.2018 09.04.2019 Architektur Adreno 600
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
129 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
112 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
200519 Points (20%)
min: 36810 avg: 78986 median: 81385.5 (8%) max: 85487 Points
min: 44009 avg: 51701 median: 52650 (5%) max: 56640 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
27848 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
3108 Points (3%)
2900 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
6347 Points (2%)
3273 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
770 Points (1%)
494 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
821 Points (1%)
504 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
30971 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 8065 avg: 10160 median: 10372 (45%) max: 11534 Points
min: 4034 avg: 5761 median: 6083 (26%) max: 6568 Points
min: 3002 avg: 3603 median: 3646 (16%) max: 3939 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 10491 avg: 15129 median: 15637.5 (34%) max: 17179 Points
min: 5228 avg: 7671 median: 8245 (18%) max: 8451 Points
min: 3101 avg: 3734 median: 3753.5 (8%) max: 4256 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 5094 avg: 8481 median: 8770 (44%) max: 9839 Points
min: 3512 avg: 4589 median: 4765 (24%) max: 5200 Points
min: 2214 avg: 2624 median: 2626 (13%) max: 2938 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 7930 avg: 11533 median: 11753 (35%) max: 12914 Points
min: 4133 avg: 5424 median: 5673 (17%) max: 8206 Points
min: 2085 avg: 2495 median: 2471 (7%) max: 2832 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 7991 avg: 8422 median: 8055 (72%) max: 9221 Points
min: 4363 avg: 5811 median: 6118 (54%) max: 6454 Points
min: 2845 avg: 3469 median: 3528 (31%) max: 4021 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 10111 avg: 11212 median: 10261 (62%) max: 13263 Points
min: 5637 avg: 7763 median: 8179 (49%) max: 8312 Points
min: 2720 avg: 3552 median: 3610 (22%) max: 4232 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 6140 avg: 6868 median: 6868 (34%) max: 7596 Points
min: 3197 avg: 4388 median: 4617 (23%) max: 4734 Points
min: 2192 avg: 2505 median: 2489 (12%) max: 2783 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 6816 avg: 8126 median: 8126 (27%) max: 9436 Points
min: 3488 avg: 4919 median: 5158 (17%) max: 5246 Points
min: 2008 avg: 2355 median: 2310 (8%) max: 2694 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 3959 avg: 5588 median: 5761.5 (3%) max: 5925 Points
min: 637 avg: 899 median: 934 (0%) max: 1124 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 974 avg: 1423 median: 1498 (2%) max: 1564 Points
min: 258 avg: 447 median: 313 (0%) max: 1047 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
2636 Points (2%)
1921 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
3037 Points (1%)
1849 Points (1%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 624 avg: 639 median: 645 (1%) max: 648 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 572 avg: 590 median: 599 (1%) max: 599 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 630 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
257 Points (0%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 618 288 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 11 avg: 12.3 median: 13 (5%) max: 13 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 19 avg: 26.8 median: 27.5 (5%) max: 32 fps
min: 11 avg: 15.6 median: 14 (3%) max: 31 fps
min: 5.4 avg: 7 median: 6.9 (1%) max: 10 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 39 avg: 69.2 median: 71 (5%) max: 87 fps
min: 29 avg: 35.2 median: 37 (3%) max: 38 fps
min: 15 avg: 18.1 median: 18 (1%) max: 21 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 42 avg: 59 median: 62 (7%) max: 74 fps
min: 25 avg: 33.4 median: 35 (4%) max: 35 fps
min: 14 avg: 17.1 median: 17 (2%) max: 19 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 52 avg: 93.6 median: 95 (2%) max: 126 fps
min: 20.63 avg: 52.5 median: 58 (1%) max: 61 fps
min: 24 avg: 29.8 median: 30 (1%) max: 33 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 73 avg: 135.5 median: 138 (8%) max: 180 fps
min: 54 avg: 73.1 median: 75 (4%) max: 83 fps
min: 34 avg: 40.9 median: 41 (2%) max: 45 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 + Qualcomm Adreno 660 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 161 avg: 241 median: 257 (2%) max: 294 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 630
min: 88.2 avg: 140.2 median: 150 (1%) max: 152 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 618
min: 67 avg: 83.1 median: 84.5 (1%) max: 91 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 200834 avg: 295219 median: 305358 (38%) max: 321314 Points
min: 74888 avg: 89032 median: 90943.5 (11%) max: 95350 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 107.62 avg: 108.5 median: 108.5 (1%) max: 109.3 fps
min: 23.89 avg: 26.3 median: 26.3 (0%) max: 28.78 fps
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
min: 4055 avg: 4338 median: 4337.5 (1%) max: 4620 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU Vulkan
min: 4370 avg: 4532 median: 4532 (1%) max: 4694 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
53822 Points (18%)
min: 10791 avg: 11937 median: 11936.5 (4%) max: 13082 Points
min: 10269 avg: 16045 median: 10289 (4%) max: 27578 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
42266 Points (70%)
min: 4195 avg: 4225 median: 4225 (7%) max: 4255 Points
min: 3043 avg: 9739 median: 3056 (5%) max: 23117 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 6.25 avg: 9.6 median: 10.2 (4%) max: 13.1 Watt
3.4 Watt (1%)
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 660 → 100% n=17 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 630 → 53% n=17 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 618 → 28% n=17
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Spiele-Benchmarks Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.
100%
Adreno 660:
60 [X] OnePlus 9 Pro 2.2.0.4027
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
59 fps, max:
60 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 660:
118 119.2 [X] Razer Edge 5.1.0.7895
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
108 fps, max:
122 fps
~ 119 fps
100%
Adreno 660:
60 60.2 [X] Razer Edge 5.1.0.7895
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
58 fps, max:
61 fps
~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 660:
59.3 [X] Razer Edge 4.5.0_21307647_21321795
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
30 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 660:
58.8 [X] Razer Edge 4.5.0_21307647_21321795
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
45 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 660:
55.6 [X] Razer Edge 4.5.0_21307647_21321795
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
42 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 660:
30 [X] Xiaomi Mi 11i 1.60.13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
30 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Oppo Find X5 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
56 78 120 [X] Asus ROG Phone 5 1.58.7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
116 fps, max:
122 fps
120 ~ 72 fps
91%
Adreno 630:
60 [X] OnePlus 6 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
46 fps, max:
60 fps
fps
67%
Adreno 630:
40 [X] OnePlus 6 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
36 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Xiaomi Poco F1 0.8.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
11 fps, max:
41 fps
~ 40 fps
67%
Adreno 618:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 660:
30 [X] Xiaomi Mi 11i 1.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
24 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Xiaomi Mix 4 1.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Oppo Find X5 1.8.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
59 [X] Razer Edge 3.1.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
51 fps, max:
61 fps
60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 9 Pro 1.3.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 660
min:
57 fps, max:
61 fps
60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 54 fps
67%
Adreno 630:
30 [X] OnePlus 6 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] HTC U12 Plus 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
1 fps, max:
41 fps
30 30 35 [X] LG G7 ThinQ 0.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
28 fps, max:
42 fps
40 40 40 40 [X] Xiaomi Poco F1 0.8.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
18 fps, max:
41 fps
40 40 [X] LG V40 ThinQ 0.10.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
7 fps, max:
41 fps
~ 36 fps
Adreno 630:
60 [X] HTC U12 Plus 4.10.0.604
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
57 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Adreno 630:
31 60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6 1.22.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
58 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.25.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
58 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 60 [X] Xiaomi Mi 8 1.27.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
56 fps, max:
60 fps
61 ~ 57 fps
Adreno 630:
44 [X] LG G7 ThinQ 1.22.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
27 fps, max:
61 fps
58 59 60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6 1.22.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
50 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 60 60 60 [X] Xiaomi Poco F1 1.24.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
34 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.25.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
56 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 60 [X] Xiaomi Mi 8 1.27.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
57 fps, max:
60 fps
61 [X] Asus ROG Phone 1.25.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
40 fps, max:
63 fps
~ 59 fps
Adreno 630:
60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6 1.10.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
18 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.14.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
59 fps, max:
61 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
Adreno 630:
60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6 1.10.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
1 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 60 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.14.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
59 fps, max:
61 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
Adreno 618:
60 [X] Xiaomi Mi 9T 1.18.5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 2.2GHz
Adreno 618
min:
1 fps, max:
61 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
Adreno 630:
60 60 60 60 [X] Razer Phone 2 4.0.21221
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
50 fps, max:
61 fps
~ 60 fps
Adreno 630:
60 60 [X] LG V40 ThinQ 4.2.22023
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
57 fps, max:
61 fps
109 [X] Razer Phone 2 4.0.21221
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
75 fps, max:
121 fps
~ 76 fps
50%
Adreno 630:
29 [X] Xiaomi Mi 8 1.4.1a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
27 fps, max:
30 fps
30 30 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.1.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Adreno 660:
59 60 60 ~ 60 fps
57%
Adreno 630:
30 30 30 [X] OnePlus 6T 1.1.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 30 [X] Xiaomi Mi 8 1.4.1a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
28 fps, max:
30 fps
61 ~ 34 fps
Adreno 630:
60 [X] Razer Phone 2 7.0.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
39 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
168%
Adreno 630:
101 [X] Razer Phone 2 7.0.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
46 fps, max:
121 fps
fps
Adreno 630:
60 [X] Asus ROG Phone 1.95.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 2.8GHz
Adreno 630
min:
58 fps, max:
62 fps
fps
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 660 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 630 → 76% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 63%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 618 → 85% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 73%
Qualcomm Adreno 660 low med. high ultra QHD 4K League of Legends: Wild Rift 60 119 60 Call of Duty Mobile 91 60 Genshin Impact 59.3 58.8 55.6 Armajet 72 PUBG Mobile 66 60 54 40 Dead Trigger 2 166 Asphalt 9: Legends 60 60 Real Racing 3 60 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 4 1 1 1 4 1 2 2
Qualcomm Adreno 618 low med. high ultra QHD 4K League of Legends: Wild Rift 114 99 83.5 Call of Duty Mobile 60 58 57 Armajet 56 PUBG Mobile 38 40 30 Arena of Valor 54 55 Shadow Fight 3 60 60 Dota 2 Reborn 27.6 19.7 9.6 8.7 Asphalt 8: Airborne 30 Asphalt 9: Legends 30 30 BioShock Infinite 23 17.6 16.9 Diablo III 20.7 20 17.2 12 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 3 3 3 3 1 3 5 2 2 2 1
v1.28
log 01. 02:03:26
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 10603 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 8780 +0s ... 0s
#3 checking url part for id 9900 +0s ... 0s
#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1730423005s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 05:16:44 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#6 composed specs +0.026s ... 0.027s
#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s
#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.027s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10603 +0.03s ... 0.056s
#10 got single benchmarks 10603 +0.03s ... 0.086s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 8780 +0s ... 0.087s
#12 got single benchmarks 8780 +0.02s ... 0.107s
#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 9900 +0s ... 0.107s
#14 got single benchmarks 9900 +0.022s ... 0.129s
#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.129s
#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.043s ... 0.172s
#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.172s
#18 Got 282 rows for game benchmarks. +0.035s ... 0.207s
#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.207s
#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.209s
#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.008s ... 0.217s
#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.217s
#23 return log +0.001s ... 0.218s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
